Murat Altuglu, Gastautor / 02.11.2013 / 17:22 / 0 / Seite ausdrucken

Excuse me, Mr. President, why are you not happy?

Murat Altuglu

In the previous week, German president Joachim Gauck said that he was “very thankful” that a “populist party” like the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) was not able to overcome the five percent threshold and enter the Bundestag. The chairman of the AfD, Bernd Lucke, promptly reacted to this by pointing out that such political position taking by the German head of state was both unheard of and inappropriate. While there is no constitutional requirement for the president to be above party lines, as a convention and gentlemen’s agreement, political neutrality is expected by the president.

The derisive comments of Gauck were therefore unusual and more importantly damaging to the AfD. Keep in mind that the AfD is a nascent party, not even a year old. Thus such contemptuous remarks by the president can be very harmful for the prospects of the AfD. Noting that in the aftermath of the election to the Bundestag, the German state-media increased its attacks on the AfD as well, the reaction of Lucke becomes therefore quite understandable.

However, a critique of Gauck merely on the grounds that he trespassed on a convention is not a satisfactory argument. A convention, especially a political one, is not written in stone. Instead, it is an arbitrary convention, agreed on in past times. Thus, if one’s argument is that the president should not make such comments, another person could easily assert the opposite opinion. “You say the president should keep his opinion to himself. I don’t think so.” Who is right, who is wrong? The answer is, no one. In the end, a political convention is merely based on opinion and is therefore alterable.

A much more sophisticated response to Gauck would have been to devalue his remarks and show that they had no intellectual merit by themselves. Gauck is happy that the AfD is not in the Bundestag. Good for him. And I am not happy that the Greens are in the Bundestag. So what? An opinion is not an argument. Without substantiating it, the value and validity of the opinion cannot be established. In the notorious (and in this case actually apposite) words of Merkel, Gauck’s opinion is “überhaupt nicht hilfreich;” it has no utility. Lucke should have turned on this weakness of Gauck’s remarks.

If Lucke had challenged Gauck to explain himself and state why the exclusion of the AfD is beneficial he would have started a debate. Thus, Lucke would have put Gauck on the spot rather being the one on it. Furthermore, a debate is something that can be won by arguments. It requires thought and refutation of thought. Thus it is the opposite of simple (and unproven) assertions. Assuming that there is no merit to Gauck’s assertion other than a general antipathy towards the AfD, Lucke could have set the record straight by engaging Gauck.

Consider that Lucke’s reproach of Gauck for speaking in a manner that he is not supposed to does not constitute a refutation of Gauck’s claim. The audience (=electorate) does not hear if what the president said was manifestly wrong or not. They only hear that Gauck was not supposed to say what he said. It might appear obvious that the latter implies the former, but public opinion is not formed on the basis of reason and logic.

Lucke should have directly addressed Gauck in public and asked “why Mr. President are you happy that the AfD is not in the Bundestag? What is it that bothers you that more than two million Germans voted for us? What are your reasons?” “Why do you label us derogatorily as a populist party?” This way, he would have made Gauck explain himself and engage in a conversation, which Lucke would very likely have won. The goal must have been to refute Gauck by not (only) stating that his comments were inappropriate but wrong.

Sie lesen gern Achgut.com?
Zeigen Sie Ihre Wertschätzung!

via Direktüberweisung
Leserpost

netiquette:

Leserbrief schreiben

Leserbriefe können nur am Erscheinungstag des Artikel eingereicht werden. Die Zahl der veröffentlichten Leserzuschriften ist auf 50 pro Artikel begrenzt. An Wochenenden kann es zu Verzögerungen beim Erscheinen von Leserbriefen kommen. Wir bitten um Ihr Verständnis.

Verwandte Themen
Murat Altuglu, Gastautor / 18.01.2021 / 17:00 / 33

Merkel, Spahn, Lauterbach, Scholz – alle haben versagt

Von Murat Altuglu. Die Corona-Lage war absehbar und vermeidbar. Hunderte Menschen, die pro Tag sterben. Allein und qualvoll.  Entsprechend kommt Vizekanzler Scholz endlich in Bewegung und stellt Fragen.…/ mehr

Murat Altuglu, Gastautor / 03.11.2014 / 11:40 / 6

Frau Fahimi ist keine Gefahr für Deutschland

Murat Altuglu Das Wort Gefahr signalisiert, dass ein Sachschaden oder eine Beeinträchtigung von Leib und Leben eintreten kann. Es gibt daher eine Reihe von  …/ mehr

Murat Altuglu, Gastautor / 17.06.2014 / 20:55 / 3

Katrin und der Exodus der Tataren

Wenn Katrin Göring-Eckart spricht, dann benutzt sie gerne biblische Metaphern, wie es sich für eine “Theologin” gehört. Vor kurzem war es der Exodus der Tataren.…/ mehr

Murat Altuglu, Gastautor / 02.06.2014 / 15:33 / 4

Qualitätsjournalismus aus Hamburg

Murat Altuglu Im deutschen Sprachgebrauch gibt es das Wort Qualitätsjournalismus. Als ich noch an einer deutschen Uni war, wurde immer wieder geraten, eine überregionale Qualitätszeitung…/ mehr

Murat Altuglu, Gastautor / 06.04.2014 / 21:32 / 4

Eine reine Ermessensentscheidung

Murat Altuglu In der vergangenen Woche traf das Bundesverfassungsgericht eine wichtige Entscheidung. Es entschied, dass zu viele „staatsnahe“ Politiker im Verwaltungsrat des ZDF sitzen. Zurzeit…/ mehr

Murat Altuglu, Gastautor / 16.10.2013 / 03:08 / 2

Gutmenschen and Empty Speeches

Murat Altuglu Without going necessarily into Freudian psychoanalysis, it suffices to state that what people say, reveals a lot about their personality. In the aggregate,…/ mehr

Murat Altuglu, Gastautor / 27.05.2013 / 19:37 / 0

Die Grünen: Selbstdarstellung und Selbstbetrug

Murat Altuglu Einige Abgeordnete der Grünen wollen nicht israelische Produkte kaufen, die in Judäa und Samaria hergestellt wurden. Sie wollen dem deutschen Konsumenten “informierte Kaufentscheidungen”…/ mehr

Murat Altuglu, Gastautor / 24.05.2013 / 22:33 / 0

Dumm oder arrogant. Oder beides?

Murat Altuglu Auf der Achse des Guten habe ich den Schriftwechsel zwischen Marieluise Beck und Henryk Broder gelesen. Es wird oft gesagt, es gibt keine…/ mehr

Unsere Liste der Guten

Ob als Klimaleugner, Klugscheißer oder Betonköpfe tituliert, die Autoren der Achse des Guten lassen sich nicht darin beirren, mit unabhängigem Denken dem Mainstream der Angepassten etwas entgegenzusetzen. Wer macht mit? Hier
Autoren

Unerhört!

Warum senken so viele Menschen die Stimme, wenn sie ihre Meinung sagen? Wo darf in unserer bunten Republik noch bunt gedacht werden? Hier
Achgut.com