04.09.2008 00:00 +Feedback
Benjamin Weinthal: ‘Anti-Zionism a type of anti-Semitism’
The court largely waived the injunction against Broder. Nathan Gelbart, Broder’s attorney, told The Jerusalem Post that “the ruling says that Mr. Broder is not supposed to call Ms. Hecht-Galinski statements anti-Semitic. As long as he gives reasons for this charge of anti-Semitism, there is no problem, and the court also stated that because of the kinds of statements that Ms. Hecht-Galinski makes in public, she has to accept that other people consider these statements as anti-Semitic, as long as it is related to a context. I consider it a win because the court issued Henryk Broder and the public a user manual on how to call Ms. Hecht-Galinski’s statements anti-Semitic.”
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1220444322564&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Permanenter Link | Druckversion
Kategorie(n): Inland