Dr. Benny Peiser 25.01.2010 14:16 +Feedback
2035 and all that
Der Spiegel fragt: “Warum aber ist der offensichtliche Unsinn nicht längst irgendeinem der 3000 Wissenschaftler aufgefallen, die am IPCC-Bericht mitgewirkt haben?” Und hier ist die Antwort: The Global Warming Policy Foundation today released, for the first time, details of the defective process by which the 2035 Himalayas date got into an IPCC report. Inherent and serious flaws in the review process clearly emerge from this new evidence. As a result of a Freedom of Information request, David Holland, a GWPF researcher, gained access to the responses by the IPCC’s lead authors. The documents show that most doubts and questions that were raised about the 2035 date were ignored and that the Review Editors failed to take any note of it. Das ganze Dossier ist hier zu lesen
Permanenter Link | Druckversion
Kategorie(n): Klima-Debatte